As someone who has been deeply immersed in the world of breaking, I’ve witnessed firsthand the excitement, anticipation, and heated debates surrounding breaking’s upcoming Olympic debut in Paris 2024. This historic moment for the dance form has ignited passionate discussions within the breaking community, raising questions about authenticity, cultural representation, and the very nature of breaking itself. In this in-depth exploration, we’ll dive into the complexities of breaking’s journey to the Olympics and the controversies that have emerged along the way.

The Rise of Breaking: From the Bronx to the World Stage

To understand the current debates, we need to look back at breaking’s origins. Born in the 1970s in the Bronx, New York, breaking emerged as a powerful form of self-expression for marginalized youth, particularly in African American and Latino communities. It quickly became a fundamental element of hip-hop culture, alongside MCing, DJing, and graffiti art.

Breaking’s journey from street corners to the global stage has been nothing short of remarkable. In the 1980s, it exploded into mainstream consciousness, featured in movies like “Beat Street” and “Breakin’,” and even making its way to Ronald Reagan’s second inauguration gala in 1985. However, this initial wave of popularity was short-lived, and breaking largely retreated underground in the following decades.

Holman’s New York City Breakers met Ronald Reagan in 1985.

Despite its fading from the mainstream spotlight, breaking continued to thrive and evolve within its community. International competitions like Battle of the Year and Red Bull BC One emerged, providing platforms for breakers to showcase their skills on a global scale. This gradual build-up of a competitive infrastructure laid the groundwork for breaking’s eventual consideration as an Olympic sport.

The Olympic Journey: From Youth Games to Paris 2024

Breaking’s path to the Olympics began with its inclusion in the 2018 Youth Olympic Games in Buenos Aires. The success of this event paved the way for the International Olympic Committee’s (IOC) decision to include breaking in the Paris 2024 program, announced in December 2020.

This decision was met with mixed reactions within the breaking community. For many, it represented a long-awaited recognition of breaking as a legitimate athletic pursuit and an opportunity to showcase the art form to a global audience. Others, however, expressed concern about the potential impact on breaking’s cultural integrity and authenticity.

Breaking was included as a medal event at the 2018 Youth Olympic Games in Buenos Aires.

The Olympic Format: A New Arena for Breaking

The Olympic breaking competition will feature 32 athletes (16 B-Boys and 16 B-Girls) competing in one-on-one battles. Judges will evaluate performances based on criteria such as creativity, personality, technique, variety, performativity, and musicality. This format, while familiar to competitive breakers, represents a significant departure from breaking’s roots as a spontaneous, community-driven art form.

One of the most controversial aspects of the Olympic format is the music selection. Due to copyright issues, the Olympics will not feature the classic hip-hop tracks that many breakers consider essential to the art form. Instead, DJs will select music within a specified range of beats per minute, potentially disconnecting the dance from its musical roots.

See also  What Dance Students Love and Hate About Their Choreographers

The Authenticity Debate: Art Form vs. Sport

At the heart of the controversy surrounding breaking’s Olympic inclusion is the question of whether breaking should be classified as a sport at all. Many within the breaking community, particularly those from the old school, argue that framing breaking as a sport diminishes its cultural significance and artistic essence.

Ken Swift, a pioneering member of the Rock Steady Crew, expresses this sentiment clearly: “It’s not a sport. An art form that we created with our own terminology and heritage and tradition, all of a sudden for an opportunity, we start calling ourselves athletes and calling this art a sport?”

This perspective highlights a crucial tension: the desire for wider recognition and opportunities versus the fear of losing breaking’s soul in the process. The Olympic stage offers unprecedented exposure and potential resources for breakers, but at what cost to the culture’s integrity?

Evolving Techniques: Artistry vs. Athleticism

Another point of contention is the evolution of breaking techniques. Many veteran breakers express concern that the increasing emphasis on athleticism and acrobatics is overshadowing the dance’s musical roots and expressive qualities.

Michael Holman, who managed the New York City Breakers in the 1980s, observes: “A lot of these new jack, young breakers, many of them are these incredible gymnasts… But are they dancing to the music? If your routine can just be done without music, then that’s not breaking.”

This shift towards more gymnastic-like movements raises questions about the future direction of breaking. Will the Olympic spotlight accelerate this trend, potentially alienating breaking from its cultural foundations?

Cultural Representation and Education

A significant concern among many in the breaking community is the lack of emphasis on the art form’s cultural context and history. Gabriel Dionisio, known as Kwikstep, expresses this worry: “What I’m concerned with is the lack of cultural representation. Its origins, where it comes from.”

This concern extends beyond the competition itself to the broader narrative surrounding breaking’s Olympic debut. Many fear that the media coverage and public perception will focus solely on the athletic aspects of breaking, neglecting its rich cultural heritage and social significance.

The Perspective of Olympic Breakers

Interestingly, many of the breakers who have qualified for or are aiming to compete in the Olympics are acutely aware of these debates and are actively working to balance competitive success with cultural authenticity.

Sunny Choi, who qualified for the U.S. Olympic team, emphasizes the importance of educating the public about breaking’s roots: “You don’t have breaking without hip-hop. You don’t have breaking without the culture.”

Similarly, Philip Kim (B-Boy Phil Wizard) from Canada acknowledges the art form’s origins while also seeing potential for growth: “It comes from Black and Latino culture. That’s the roots of where it came from. But I think it also speaks on the beauty of where breaking and hip-hop, in general, can go.”

Canada’s B-Boy Philip Kim

These athletes are in a unique position, serving as bridges between the traditional breaking community and the new Olympic audience. Their approach to this role could significantly influence how breaking is perceived and evolves in the coming years.

See also  Learn How to Backflip in 5 Minutes

The Future of Breaking: Olympic Impact and Beyond

As breaking prepares for its Olympic debut, the community faces several critical questions:

  1. How will the Olympic spotlight affect the grassroots breaking scene?
  2. Can breaking maintain its cultural integrity while adapting to the Olympic format?
  3. Will the increased visibility lead to more resources and opportunities for breakers worldwide?
  4. How can the breaking community ensure that its history and cultural significance are adequately represented?

Interestingly, the IOC has not included breaking in the program for the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics, a decision that has puzzled many given L.A.’s significance in breaking history. This uncertainty about breaking’s Olympic future adds another layer of complexity to these debates.

Conclusion: Navigating a Pivotal Moment

As someone who has been deeply involved in the breaking scene for the past five years, I’ve witnessed the passion and dedication that breakers bring to their art form. The Olympic debut represents a pivotal moment for breaking, offering unprecedented opportunities for exposure and growth while also posing challenges to its cultural foundations.

The key to navigating this new era lies in striking a balance between embracing new opportunities and preserving the essence of breaking culture. This will require ongoing dialogue within the community, education of the wider public, and a commitment from Olympic organizers and media to present breaking in its full cultural context.

As we look forward to the electrifying battles that will unfold in Paris, it’s crucial to appreciate breaking not just as a competitive sport, but as a dynamic art form with a rich history and cultural significance. The Olympic stage may be new, but the spirit of breaking – its creativity, its power to build community, and its ability to give voice to the marginalized – remains as vital as ever.

The journey of breaking from the streets of the Bronx to the Olympic stage in Paris is a testament to the power and resilience of hip-hop culture. As the world tunes in to watch B-Boys and B-Girls showcase their skills, let’s hope that they also gain an appreciation for the deep cultural roots and transformative power of this incredible art form. The Olympic debut of breaking is not just a moment for sport – it’s a moment for cultural recognition, education, and celebration of the enduring legacy of hip-hop.

Leave a reply